Money or children? Power sources in divorce mediation


In Western societies, family law has transformed from a hierarchical relationship into a system of gender-neutral equality aspiring terms. Many families however, still apply traditional, gendered patterns in their division of labour and family life, even in a country like The Netherlands which is characterised by strong gender egalitarianism.

In this paper we argue that the division of gender-based roles in family life affects power distribution in divorce mediation as well as the use of certain power resources by men and women. To test this, we survey 60 experienced Dutch mediators and introduce a new classification model for power sources distinguishing between material and immaterial power.

As predicted, in divorce mediation, mediators perceive generally an equal power distribution between men and women, but power bases differ strongly: whereas men were considered to rely more on material resources, women were considered to rely more on immaterial resources. Implications for mediation practice are discussed.


Katalien N L Bollen
Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Alain-Laurent Verbeke
Department of Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Martin C Euwema
Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium


Albeck, S., & Kaydar, D. (2002). Divorced mothers: Their network of friends pre- and post-divorce. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 36, 111-138.

Arulampalam, W., Booth, A., & Bryan, M. (2007). Is there a glass ceiling over Europe? Exploring the gender pay gaps across the wage distribution. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60(2), 163-186.

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2007). Lifetime marriage and divorce trends. In Australian Social Trends (Cat. No. 4102.0), Canberra, ACT: Author.

Baitar, R., Buysse, A., Brondeel, R., De Mol, J., & Rober, P. (2012). Post-divorce wellbeing in Flanders: Facilitative professionals and quality of arrangements matter. Journal of Family Studies, 18(1), 62-75.

Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 339-363.

Beck, C. J. A., & Sales, B. D. (2001). Family mediation: Facts, myths and future prospects. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Bianchi, S. M., Subaiya, L., & Kahn, J. R. (1999). The gender gap in the economic well-being of nonresident fathers and custodial mothers. Demography, 36, 195-203.

Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). The gender pay gap: Have women gone as far as they can? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 7-23.

Bouman, A. M. (2004). Financiële gevolgen van echtscheiding voor man en vrouw. Bevolkingstrends, 2, 67-74.

Braver, S. L., Fitzpatrick, P., & Bay, C. (1991). Noncustodial parent's reports of child support payments. Family Relations, 40, 180-185.

Brescoll, V. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological Science, 19(3), 268-275.

Brett, J. M. (2001). Negotiating globally: How to negotiate deals, resolve disputes, and make decisions across cultural boundaries? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bruins, J. (1999). Social power and influence tactics: A theoretical introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 7-14.

Buehler, C. (1987). Initiator status and the divorce transition. Family Relations, 36(1), 82-86.

Bugental, D. B., & Lewis, J. C. (1999). The paradoxical misuse of power by those who see themselves as powerless: How does it happen? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 51-64.

Carli, L. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55(1), 81-99.

Carli, L. L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 725-741.

Casals, M. M. (2005). Divorce mediation in Europe: An introductory outline. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 9. Retrieved from

Cashmore, J. (2011). Reasons for disputes in high conflict families. Journal of Family Studies, 17(3), 187-203.

Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2010). Persberichten Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek d.d. 10 februari 2010 (PB10-006) en 29 november 2009 (PB09-075).

Coltrane, S., & Adams, M. (2003). The social construction of the divorce 'problem': Morality, child victims, and the politics of gender. Family Relations, 52(4), 363-372.

Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80(2), 655-682.

De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2004). The influence of power on the information search, impression formation, and demands in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(3), 303-319.

Demo, D. H., & Fine, M. A. (2010). Beyond the average divorce. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Ellis, D., & Wight, L. (1998). Theorizing power in divorce negotiations: Implications for practice. Mediation Quarterly, 15(3), 227-244.

Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power dependence relations: Two experiments. Sociometry, 27, 282-298.

Emery, R. E., & Dillon, P. (1994). Conceptualizing the divorce process: Renegotiating boundaries of intimacy and power in the divorced family system. Family Relations, 43(4), 374-379.

Emery, R. E., Sbarra, D., & Grover, T. (2005). Divorce mediation: Research and reflections. Family Court Review, 43(1), 22-37.

Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 618-628.

Fineman, M. L. A. (1991). The illusion of equality: The rhetoric and reality of divorce reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Fineman, M. L. A. (1995). The neutered mother, the sexual family and other twentieth century tragedies. New York, NY: Routledge.

Fineman, M. L. A. (2000). Cracking the foundational myths: Independence, autonomy, and self-sufficiency. Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 8, 13-20.

Fineman, M. L. A. (2001). Why marriage? University of Virginia Journal of Law and Social Policy, 9(1), 239-272.

Fineman, M. L. A. (2004). Progress and progression in family law. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1, 1-25.

Fiol, C. M., O'Connor, E. J., & Aguinis, H. (2001). All for one and one for all? The development and transfer of power across organization levels. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 224-242.

Fisher, R. J., & Grégoire, Y. (2006). Gender differences in decision satisfaction within established dyads: Effects of competitive and cooperative behaviors. Psychology & Marketing, 23(4), 313-333.

Foa, U. G., Converse, J., Törnblom, K. Y., & Foa, E. B. (1993). Resource theory: Explorations and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Forder, C., & Verbeke, A. (2005). Geen woorden maar daden. In C. Forder & A. Verbeke (Eds.), Gehuwd of niet: Maakt het iets uit? (pp. 548-555). Antwerp, Belgium: Intersentia.

French, J. R. P. J., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The basis of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

Funder, K. (1986). Work and the marriage partnership. In P. McDonald (Ed.), Settling up: Property and income distribution on divorce in Australia. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

Funder, K. (1993). Women's post-separation employment and reliance on social security. In K. Funder, M. Harrison, & R. Weston (Eds.), Settling down: Pathways of parents after divorce. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

Gale, J., Mowery, R. L., Hermann, M. S., & Hollett, N. (2002). Considering effective divorce mediation: Three potential factors. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 19(4), 389-420.

Goldman, B. M., Cropanzano, R., Stein, J. H., Shapiro, D. L., Thatcher, S., & Ko, J. (2008). The role of ideology in mediated disputes at work: A justice perspective. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(3), 210-233.

Harvey, S. M., Beckman, L. J., Browner, C. H., & Sherman, C. A. (2002). Relationship power, decision making, and sexual relations: An exploratory study couple of Mexican origin. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 284-291.

House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hughes, R., & Kirby, J. J. (2000). Strengthening evaluation strategies for divorcing family support services: Perspectives of parent educators, mediators, attorneys, and judges. Family Relations, 49(1), 53-61.

Huston, T. L. (2002). Power. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, & T. L. Huston (Eds.),Close relationships (pp. 265-314). Clinton Corners, NY: Percheron Press.

Institute for Women's Policy Research. (2008). Retrieved from

Izumi, C. (2010). Implicit bias and the illusion of mediator neutrality. Journal of Law & Policy, 34, 71-155.

Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440-452.

Konrad, M., Ritchie, J. J., Lieb, P., & Corrigal, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593-641.

Kreider, R. M., & Fields, J. M. (2001). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: Fall 1996. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.

McDermott, E. P. (2012). Discovering the importance of mediator style - An interdisciplinary challenge. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 5(4), 340-353.

Miller, R. S., Perlman, D., & Brehm, S. S. (2007). Intimate relationships (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Higher Education.

Montada, L., & Kals, E. (2007). Mediation: Ein Lehrbuch auf psychologischer Grundlage [Mediation: A psychologically based textbook]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz PVU.

Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organisations. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

Pines, A. M., Gat, H., & Tal, Y. (2002). Gender differences in content and style of argument between couples during divorce mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 20(1), 23-50.

Pryor, J., & Rodgers, B. (2001). Children in changing families. Life after parental separation. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Raven, B. H. (2001). Power/interaction and interpersonal influence: Experimental investigations and case studies. In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 217-240). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Ridgeway, C. L., & Bourg, C. (2004). Gender as status: An expectation states theory approach. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 217-241). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61-79.

Scherpe, J. (2011). Marital agreements and private autonomy in comparative perspective. Oxford, England: Hart.

Sheehan, G., & Hughes, J. (2001). Division of matrimonial property in Australia (Research Paper No. 25). Melbourne, VIC: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

Smart, C. (1990). Law's power, the sexed body, and feminist discourse. Journal of Law and Society, 17(2), 194-209.

Smart, C. (2000). Divorce and changing family practices in a post-traditional society. Family Matters, 56, 10-19.

Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Sanjiv, G. (1999). The effect of marriage and divorce on women's economic well-being. American Sociological Review, 64, 794-812.

Smyth, B. M., & Weston, R. (2000). Financial living standards after divorce: A recent snapshot (Research Paper No. 23). Melbourne, VIC: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

Somary, K., & Emery, R. E. (1991). Emotional anger and grief in divorce mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 8, 185-198.

Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Walters, A. E. (1999). Gender differences in negotiation outcome: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 653-677.

Sweeney, M. M., & Horwitz, A. V. (2001). Infidelity, initiation, and the emotional climate of divorce: Are there implications for mental health? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(3), 295-309.

Thompson, R., & Amato, P. R. (1999). The post-divorce family: Research and policy issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Verbeke, A. (1997). Le contrat de mariage de séparation de biens: Plaidoyer pour une solution équitable. Antwerp, Belgium: Kluwer.

Verbeke, A. (2001). Naar een billijk relatievermogensrecht. Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht, 38(1), 373-401.

Verbeke, A. (2002). De legitieme ontbloot of dood? Leve de echtgenoot! Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Verbeke, A. (2006). Marital property planning in a Belgian nutshell. In Over erven: Liber amicorum Mieken Puelinckx-Coene (pp. 473-498). Antwerp, Belgium: Wolters Kluwer.

Verbeke, A. (2009). Ongelijkheid in huwelijks- en samenlevingsovereenkomsten. Tijdschrift voor Confl icthantering, 8, 21-30.

Vogels, R. J. M. (2011). De stand van mediation in Nederland. Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: Stratus. Wood, R. G., Goesling, B., & Avellar, S. (2007). The effect of marriage on health: A synthesis of recent research evidence. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.

Worell, J. (2001). Encyclopaedia of women and gender: Sex similarities and differences and the impact of society on gender (Vol. 1). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Yarn, D. H. (1999). Dictionary of conflict resolution. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1990). Infl uence tactics and objectives in upward, downward and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 132-140.


divorce mediation; divorce; mediation; gender; power; power sources; work and family


PP: 159 - 173

Sign Me Up for latest release updates

*  Email Address:
    First Name:
    Last Name:
*  I am interested in:


Web Feed

Latest Articles

Special Issues

Motherhood in the early 21st Century
Volume /

What can qualitative research contribute to work and family policy?
Volume 21/1

Fatherhood in the early 21st Century
Volume 18/2-3
Summary | Contents

Mediating Family Disputes
Volume 17/3
Summary | Contents

Child Support
Volume 16/1
Summary | Contents

Parenting Around the World
Volume 15/3
Summary | Contents

Family Work Balance
Volume 15/2
Summary | Contents

Innovative Approaches to Family Violence
Volume 14/2-3
Summary | Contents

Children in Focus (II)
Volume 9/2
Summary | Contents

Children in Focus (I)
Volume 9/1
Summary | Contents

Families in Rural Settings
Volume 6/2
Summary | Contents

Ageing and Family
Volume 5/2
Summary | Contents

Loss and Grief in Family Settings
Volume 4/2
Summary | Contents

Empowerment of Families
Volume 3/1
Summary | Contents - The citation linking backbone

Website by Fig Creative Sunshine Coast Website Design