Child Informed Mediation Study (CIMS): Incorporating the children's perspective into divorce mediation in an American pilot study

Abstract

Children experiencing parental separation may benefit from forms of mediation that systematically help parents consider the needs and best interests of their children. Child Focused (CF) and Child Inclusive (CI) mediation approaches were designed to meet this need and thus may offer effective means to improve the impact of mediation on families.

An initial study in Australia provided evidence of the positive effects of CF and CI and favored CI over CF (McIntosh et al., 2008). We designed the Child Informed Mediation Study (CIMS) to further test CF and CI mediation. The CIMS is being conducted in a different location (the United States), uses random assignment of cases to type of mediation, and compares both CF and CI to divorce mediation as usual (MAU).

For methodological and practical reasons, CIMS differs from the McIntosh et al. study in other ways (eg, using student mediators and child consultants; including a child consultant and mediator in both CF and CI). A pilot CIMS study is currently underway. No data are yet available, but we present some initial impressions regarding how the study is proceeding, problems encountered, and lessons learned.

Authors

Amy Holtzworth-Munroe
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America

Amy Applegate
Maurer School of Law, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America

Brian D'Onofrio
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America

John Bates
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America

References

Amato PR (2000) The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62, 1269-1287.

Beck CJA, Sales BD and Emery RE (2004) Research on the impact of mediation. In J Folberg, L Milne and P Salem (Eds) Divorce and family mediation (pp.447-482). New York: Guilford.

Casper LM and Bianchi SM (2002) Continuity and change in the American family. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Emery RE, Sbarra D and Grover T (2005) Divorce mediation: Research and reflections. Family Court Review 43, 22-37.

Grimes A and McIntosh J (2004) Emerging practice issues in child inclusive divorce mediation. Journal of Family Studies 10(1), 113-120. http://jfs.e-contentmanagement.com/archives/vol/10/issue/1/article/79/emerging-practice-issues-in-childinclusive

Holtzworth-Munroe A., Applegate AG and D'Onofrio BD (2009) Family dispute resolution: Charting a course for the future. Family Court Review (special issue) 47, 493-505.

Kelly JB and Emery RE (2003) Children's adjustment following divorce: Risk and resilience perspectives. Family Relations 52, 352-362.

Laumann-Billings L and Emery RE (2000) Distress among young adults from divorced families. Journal of Family Psychology 14, 671-687.

Manning WD, Smock PJ and Majumdar D (2004) The relative stability of cohabiting and marital unions for children. Population Research and Policy Review 23, 135-159.

McIntosh J (2007) Child inclusion as a principle and as evidence-based practice: Applications to family law services and related sectors. Australian Family Relationships Clearinghouse Issues, 1-23.

McIntosh J and Moloney L (2006) Creating child focused dialogues with separated parents. Theoretical and clinical underpinnings of child focused dispute resolution. Canberra: Australian Government Attorney General's Department.

McIntosh JE, Wells YD, Smyth BM and Long CM (2008). Child-focuses and child-inclusive divorce mediation: Comparative outcomes from a prospective study of post-separation adjustment. Family Court Review 46, 105-124.

Moloney L and McIntosh J (2004) Child-responsive practices in Australian Family Law: Past problems and future directions, Journal of Family Studies 10(1), 71-86. http://jfs.e-contentmanagement.com/archives/vol/10/issue/1/article/76/childresponsive-practices-in-australian-family

Schepard AI (2004) Children, courts, and custody. New York: Cambridge University Press.

US Census Bureau (2002) Current Population Report, pp.20-547, Table C3.

Keywords

child inclusive mediation; child focused mediation; children's interests; divorce mediation; child inclusive (CI); family law; student mediators and child consultants; interdisciplinary training; intervention efficacy study; empirically supported inventions; empirically validated interventions

Meta

PP: 116 - 129


Sign Me Up for latest release updates

*  Email Address:
    First Name:
    Last Name:
*  I am interested in:





 

Web Feed

Latest Articles

Special Issues

Motherhood in the early 21st Century
Volume /


What can qualitative research contribute to work and family policy?
Volume 21/1
Summary


Fatherhood in the early 21st Century
Volume 18/2-3
Summary | Contents


Mediating Family Disputes
Volume 17/3
Summary | Contents


Child Support
Volume 16/1
Summary | Contents


Parenting Around the World
Volume 15/3
Summary | Contents


Family Work Balance
Volume 15/2
Summary | Contents


Innovative Approaches to Family Violence
Volume 14/2-3
Summary | Contents


Children in Focus (II)
Volume 9/2
Summary | Contents


Children in Focus (I)
Volume 9/1
Summary | Contents


Families in Rural Settings
Volume 6/2
Summary | Contents


Ageing and Family
Volume 5/2
Summary | Contents


Loss and Grief in Family Settings
Volume 4/2
Summary | Contents


Empowerment of Families
Volume 3/1
Summary | Contents


crossref.org - The citation linking backbone

Website by Fig Creative Sunshine Coast Website Design